In the intricate landscape of functional safety, where precision can mean the difference between success and catastrophe, a persistent challenge emerges at the intersection of commitment and compliance. Imagine this scenario: An end user, driven by the imperative of robust safety functions, enters into a contractual agreement with a supplier, both parties agreeing to a fixed lump sum for Safety Integrity Level (SIL) compliance. On the surface, this seems like a prudent arrangement, aligning objectives and financial expectations. However, as the story unfolds, a complex predicament arises due to a lack of full competency in SIL on both sides.

Safety is often seen as a burden by management. You often hear comments like “Safety costs money,” “Safety is a lot of paperwork,” “Safety is slow,” “Safety stops production,” and so on. But have you ever considered the other side of the coin? In reality, safety prevents accidents and thus contributes significantly to a company's profitability. Some studies show that every dollar invested in safety makes 2 dollars. So, why not invest in safety, particularly in functional safety? Let's dive into why this is a smart move for your business.

Discover the untold story behind PEMEX, the colossal state-owned petroleum company that fuels Mexico's economy. Unveil the haunting legacy of tragedy and loss, where over 1000 lives were claimed in heart-wrenching accidents. But don't be disheartened, as we reveal the path to redemption through rigorous safety measures and strategic investments. Join us on a journey from despair to hope as we explore the financial benefits of putting safety first in the oil and gas industry. It's time to rewrite the narrative and embrace a safer and prosperous future together!

They both need failure rates, but that is about where it ends. This article explains the difference.

It is a misconception that the PFD calculation decides the proof test interval. So do you choose when to proof-test a safety function? This is one of the most asked questions we get.

A good safety function description is based on the S.L.A.T.S. concept. It describes the intention, not the solution. That is fundamental.

Everybody knows the word redundancy, but not everybody knows what it exactly means or how it applies.

How many professionals are involved when carrying out a functional safety activity? One, two, ...?

There are five tasks that are carried out for each safety life cycle phase. Do you know what they are?